Bangkok: Legal experts have provided insights into why the Chairman of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), Dr. Soran Suksa, has not vacated his position despite the Central Administrative Court's recent decision to reject a lawsuit concerning his tenure. According to Thai News Agency, the dismissal of the case by the Central Administrative Court has clarified that the decision of the Selection Committee does not impact Dr. Soran's role, allowing him to continue his duties as NBTC Chairman.
Legal analysts have pointed out that the court's ruling amidst ongoing disputes among NBTC commissioners over the qualifications of Professor Dr. Saran Boonbaichaiyapruk ensures that Dr. Saran's position remains unaffected. The court's decision emphasizes that the selection committee's judgment does not equate to removal from office, as such an action requires adherence to the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Act and necessitates a royal decree.
Administrative law specialists note that the court's ruling does not endorse or validate the Selection Committee's decision. Instead, it confirms Dr. Soran's current status as Chairman, enabling him to continue overseeing meetings and advancing the NBTC's mission without disruption. Any potential removal must follow due legal processes and cannot be solely determined by the Selection Committee's decision. Consequently, Dr. Soran remains active in his role, with no alteration to his position or responsibilities.
Despite these clarifications, there are growing concerns about the potential impact of NBTC commissioners' absence from meetings. There are calls for all commissioners to engage in their roles as mandated by law to ensure the smooth progress of telecommunications regulation and agenda considerations. Legal differences should not lead to inactivity unless legally mandated, as such delays could harm the organization's mission and the public interest, prompting a reassessment of the legal responsibilities of those involved.