Bangkok:The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a case involving 44 former Move Forward Party MPs accused of serious ethical violations related to their proposed amendments to Article 112 of the Criminal Code. The case, filed by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), seeks a ruling on these alleged violations.
According to Thai News Agency, the Supreme Court has already heard testimony from nine witnesses for the petitioners in four sessions. These witnesses include current and former parliamentary officials, legal officers, and former MPs from various political parties. Today marked the commencement of witness testimony from the opposing side, with Associate Professor Dr. Ronnakorn Boonmee and Mr. Viroj Lakkhanaadisorn taking the stand.
Dr. Ronnakorn, a criminal law scholar, provided insights based on his experience with the Constitutional Court and discussed laws protecting the monarchy, asserting his non-affiliation with the Move Forward Party. Mr. Viroj, a former spokesperson for the Move Forward Party, testified about the internal party discussions and the rationale behind the proposed amendments. He emphasized the party's concern over the misuse of Article 112 and its impact on citizens and the justice system. He also noted the lack of consensus within the party and his role as an observer in public demonstrations.
The Supreme Court has scheduled the next session to hear further witnesses on November 17th. Mr. Viroj expressed relief at the opportunity to explain his intentions and admitted to some memory lapses regarding dates and times, attributing them to human nature. He highlighted the party's commitment to resolving conflict through parliamentary means and the careful consideration given to their proposals.
The defense plans to present testimony from a total of 60 witnesses, with statements from 13 witnesses already submitted. They are also referencing a report from the Independent Committee for the Investigation and Search for Truth for Reconciliation and Harmonization. The court has set a deadline for the end of March for the defense to present a closing statement summarizing their case.