Bangkok: The deputy government spokesperson has refuted claims by Mr. Sonthi Limthongkul regarding the Khlong Wang Tonod reservoir project, emphasizing that the Cabinet's approval does not equate to "ordering the forest to be buried." The spokesperson clarified that no authorization has been given to revoke the national park area, and the government remains open to new information, insisting that any allegations of personal gain must be substantiated with evidence.
According to Thai News Agency, Ms. Lalida Periswiwatana, Deputy Spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office, addressed Mr. Sonthi's criticisms surrounding the project's public consultation process, environmental impact, and the role of government bodies. She assured that the government is prepared to investigate all concerns, particularly regarding environmental data that might have changed since the EHIA report was prepared. Ms. Lalida emphasized the importance of distinguishing facts from political conclusions and insisted that while questioning is allowed, accusations must be evidence-based.
The claim that public consultation was not conducted is disputed by the government, which states that the Royal Irrigation Department organized public hearings on September 9, 2021, attended by community members and leaders. However, the government acknowledges that one meeting does not suffice as complete consultation and stresses the need for comprehensive and verifiable consultations before making decisions about the national park area.
Ms. Lalida further clarified the roles of different agencies involved in the project. The Royal Irrigation Department owns the project, while the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment is responsible for environmental assessments. She stated that a Cabinet resolution on August 5, 2026, approved the project with a budget of 7.2 billion baht and an implementation period of seven years, emphasizing that such approval does not permit immediate deforestation or construction in the national park.
The Cabinet resolution requires agencies to secure proper permits for using protected areas, use only necessary land, and adhere to environmental measures. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment confirmed that no park area has been approved for use or revoked, and project details need review to mitigate environmental impacts.
Ms. Lalida acknowledged concerns about the ecosystem's impact, particularly regarding lowland dry evergreen forests, wild elephant habitats, and tree populations. She noted that new survey data might differ from the 2021 EHIA report and that any significant new academic data must be directly compared with existing data to ensure accuracy and sufficiency of mitigation measures.
Addressing allegations that the project primarily serves the industrial sector, Ms. Lalida explained the project's objectives include providing water for consumption, agriculture, and industry, and enhancing water security. The Royal Irrigation Department clarified that diverting water to other areas would manage surplus water, prioritizing upstream needs.
Regarding allegations of personal gain by politicians or ministers, Ms. Lalida stressed that any evidence, such as financial records or contracts, should be submitted for investigation. The government will not protect wrongdoers, but allegations must be evidence-based.
Ms. Lalida also addressed the claim that 500 MPs are indifferent to the issue, stating that MPs' performance should be evaluated based on their parliamentary activities rather than attendance at specific forums. She affirmed Mr. Sonthi's right to scrutinize the government and the government's duty to provide information and take responsibility, urging all parties to apply the same standards and rely on facts for scrutiny.